Guilderland named in personal-injury lawsuit

— Photo from Google Earth

An Oct. 16 lawsuit filed by Donna Casey against the town of Guilderland claims that on Aug. 29, 2021, Casey was cycling on Fuller Road under the CSX overpass, near the Albany city line, when she was injured. CSX and Albany are also named as co-defendants in the suit. 

GUILDERLAND — The town of Guilderland has been named as a co-defendant in a lawsuit brought by an Albany County woman who claims the town’s negligence and carelessness led her to “sustain severe and permanent personal injuries.”

The Oct. 16 lawsuit filed by Donna Casey claims that on Aug. 29, 2021, Casey was cycling on Fuller Road under the CSX overpass, near the Albany city line when she was injured. CSX and Albany are also named as co-defendants.

The filing states Casey’s injuries were a result of the area being “unsafe and dangerous” because it had been “negligently and improperly constructed and maintained,” which caused the area to become “uneven, unleveled, depressed, cracked, broken, raised, slanted and/or covered in debris consisting of rocks, dirt, pebbles, and other materials which comprised the run-off from the adjacent slope, causing the plaintiff to trip and fall at said location ….”

Davis did not put a dollar figure on the amount of damages she is seeking.

The filing claims the town on “numerous occasions” advised CSX of the “dangerous conditions which existed at the subject location, but CSX failed to meaningfully respond and remediate the dangerous condition.”

Guilderland Supervisor Peter Barber, on the advice of counsel, declined to comment on the suit. 

CSX said the company does not comment on matters in litigation. 

Last February, Guilderland tightened its law on citizens’ obligation to inform the town of defects in highways, bridges, streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, or culverts before any payments could be awarded for injuries.

Before any damages can be awarded, a resident must have filed a written complaint that one of those town structures is “defective, out of repair, unsafe, dangerous, or obstructed” and there must have been “a failure or neglect within a reasonable time after giving such notice to repair or remove the defect, danger, or obstruction complained of.”

Without legal safeguards in place, Barber said at the time, “Our premiums would go up by hundreds of thousands of dollars.” Barber said in February that there were no claims against the town.

More Guilderland News

  • The town board agreed to hire Core & Main to install about 10,000 water meters in homes across town for just under $5 million and also agreed to a table of updated fees, requiring building permits for the first time for projects like replacing windows, roofs, and siding.

  • Sarecha has enlisted two of his Hindu friends to help him gather signatures for a petition to recognize Diwali as an academic holiday, a day off from school so they can pray and celebrate with their families.

  • While one board member said it feels like the Foundry Square developer is holding a gun to the town’s head, the town planner said there was no threat and the developer has made compromises and will do heavy lifting to solve longstanding pollution and traffic problems.

The Altamont Enterprise is focused on hyper-local, high-quality journalism. We produce free election guides, curate readers' opinion pieces, and engage with important local issues. Subscriptions open full access to our work and make it possible.